|
|
Post by watchthis on May 27, 2007 9:01:18 GMT -5
Discuss.
|
|
|
|
Post by diop on May 27, 2007 23:15:42 GMT -5
I can edit it later right?
|
|
|
|
Post by watchthis on May 28, 2007 0:01:14 GMT -5
Yep. Up until start of the draft.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jesse Kearney on May 31, 2007 11:46:02 GMT -5
you should inform us how the grading/point tally will work for this. might get some people on the ball in here.
|
|
|
|
Post by reggie25 on Jun 2, 2007 19:11:29 GMT -5
The big question, If U were the Blazers, Oden or Durrant?
|
|
|
|
Post by diop on Jun 2, 2007 19:12:28 GMT -5
Durrant.. already got Magloire and whoever that white big guy is that can block
|
|
|
|
Post by reggie25 on Jun 2, 2007 19:16:46 GMT -5
i believe Durrant is the better all-round player and probaly the better pick but Oden is a force that can't be passed up... at center it may not get better than Oden coming out of college
|
|
|
|
Post by diop on Jun 2, 2007 19:58:28 GMT -5
Oden will be the better player.. but he's a position that Portland isn't looking for
|
|
|
|
Post by reggie25 on Jun 2, 2007 20:10:31 GMT -5
i agree with u there, over the last 10yrs portland has selected 1 Center and the rest have been G/Fs, 7 Fowards and 2Gs .. if history repeats itself Durrant will be chosen 1st. But on the other side Portland does have Randolph at F and he is only 25yrs old with 6yrs under his belt...
|
|
|
|
Post by Jesse Kearney on Jun 3, 2007 20:09:34 GMT -5
i agree, durrant.. they dont need a PF or C. they have their franchise in C magloire and PF randolf
BUT, i think it would be there best interest to trade away their 1st pick.. they already have their future in every position, plus they have a bench..
|
|
